Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Thursday, October 7, 2010
ECE Budget Task Force
I just heard on the news that Ann Tolley has set up a task force to examine the way the ECE budget is used. I dont often rave in public but I cannot help myself today!
I have also posted this at the ECE Together website.
Warning! Long Rant ahead!
Although we have no real details as yet I think the fact that there is only one ECE person on the team and that Tolley has admitted that she consulted only herself about setting this up, is worrying.
Reading the Stuff news item critically makes for concern I believe.
"Mrs Tolley said that under Labour, ECE costs had "blown out" to treble within five years to $1.3b a year.
There is no mention here about how ECE had grown, the demands on costs due to actually having some qualified staff and the impact of the 20 hours. And maybe that teachers were now actually being paid a reasonable salary - for the most part.
"It's vital this money is well spent to ensure the greatest number of children gain access to ECE and fully benefit from it," Mrs Tolley said.
[...]
Mrs Tolley said the review was "absolutely not about cost- cutting".
"We are determined to reach those children and families who need it most and to give every single child the best possible start in life," she said.
This is suggesting that the money is not now well spent. It ignores the fact that a lot of money has just been spent on contracts to increase participation but that these have only just begun.
The taskforce would:
* Do a full review of the value for Government investment in early childhood education.
That wont take long! There is no shortage of international and local research to show that money spent on quality ECE is money well spent.
* Look at the efficiency and effectiveness of current ECE expenditure and possible improvements for Maori, Pasifika, and children from low socio-economic backgrounds.
Does this suggest that efficient and effective use of money is to target ECE funding at specific groups and maybe remove or reduce funding for others?
* Develop innovative and cost effective ways to support children's learning in early childhood and the first years of compulsory schooling.
Innovative and cost effective to me DOES mean cost cutting as well as redistribution. If I am innovative and cost effective about my supermarket budget it is going to mean cutting the cost!! Using these words together means being innovative in order to cut costs! Otherwise we might go back to being innovative to increase quality - like before MOE funded PD was cut.
* Make recommendations to Government about proposed changes to funding and policy settings for early childhood education."
Changes in funding and policy are the most definitive. I believe this will mean some major changes including not going for the 80% registered teachers and staying at 50% (at best), targeted funding and probably targeting of the 20 hours. In the current economic climate it is not going to mean any increase in costs!
Rant over! I can go make dinner now
Maureen Perkins
I have also posted this at the ECE Together website.
Warning! Long Rant ahead!
Although we have no real details as yet I think the fact that there is only one ECE person on the team and that Tolley has admitted that she consulted only herself about setting this up, is worrying.
Reading the Stuff news item critically makes for concern I believe.
"Mrs Tolley said that under Labour, ECE costs had "blown out" to treble within five years to $1.3b a year.
There is no mention here about how ECE had grown, the demands on costs due to actually having some qualified staff and the impact of the 20 hours. And maybe that teachers were now actually being paid a reasonable salary - for the most part.
"It's vital this money is well spent to ensure the greatest number of children gain access to ECE and fully benefit from it," Mrs Tolley said.
[...]
Mrs Tolley said the review was "absolutely not about cost- cutting".
"We are determined to reach those children and families who need it most and to give every single child the best possible start in life," she said.
This is suggesting that the money is not now well spent. It ignores the fact that a lot of money has just been spent on contracts to increase participation but that these have only just begun.
The taskforce would:
* Do a full review of the value for Government investment in early childhood education.
That wont take long! There is no shortage of international and local research to show that money spent on quality ECE is money well spent.
* Look at the efficiency and effectiveness of current ECE expenditure and possible improvements for Maori, Pasifika, and children from low socio-economic backgrounds.
Does this suggest that efficient and effective use of money is to target ECE funding at specific groups and maybe remove or reduce funding for others?
* Develop innovative and cost effective ways to support children's learning in early childhood and the first years of compulsory schooling.
Innovative and cost effective to me DOES mean cost cutting as well as redistribution. If I am innovative and cost effective about my supermarket budget it is going to mean cutting the cost!! Using these words together means being innovative in order to cut costs! Otherwise we might go back to being innovative to increase quality - like before MOE funded PD was cut.
* Make recommendations to Government about proposed changes to funding and policy settings for early childhood education."
Changes in funding and policy are the most definitive. I believe this will mean some major changes including not going for the 80% registered teachers and staying at 50% (at best), targeted funding and probably targeting of the 20 hours. In the current economic climate it is not going to mean any increase in costs!
Rant over! I can go make dinner now
Maureen Perkins
Saturday, August 14, 2010
Why didn’t I study Philosophy?
As I continue with my exploratory reading for my thesis work I am struck by my own ignorance. None of my previous study has done more than touch on philosophical theories and all the books I am reading are assuming that I spent my formative years soaking up the wisdom of Nietzsche, Marx, Heidegger and the rest. But basically all I can do is hear the Monty Python song going through my head –
Interesting that this information just has not come into my education study and yet I need that background so badly now. I don't have time for a Philosophy degree so will just have to do my best!
P.S. You may have noticed a more personal slant to this Blog. That's because it is not part of any particular work but I can still see a need for it. Feel free to ignore posts and use this as a portal to other sites.
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
My research
I have now met with both of my supervisors and am inspired and excited and only need another day or two a week to be added to my calendar!
I am going to be exploring Kei Tua o te Pae and other documents relevant to ECE in NZ and will be identifying areas of ambiguity, contradictions and gaps. I have been enjoying reading 2 books in particular:
"Deconstructing Early Childhood education" by Gaile Cannella
and "Doing Foucault in Early Childhood Education" by Glenda MacNaughton.
Great for getting your head into a critical space!
I thoroughly recommend these books to anyone exploring ECE issues. You may not agree with some of the stances taken by the autors but you will certainly be challenged!
I am going to be exploring Kei Tua o te Pae and other documents relevant to ECE in NZ and will be identifying areas of ambiguity, contradictions and gaps. I have been enjoying reading 2 books in particular:
"Deconstructing Early Childhood education" by Gaile Cannella
and "Doing Foucault in Early Childhood Education" by Glenda MacNaughton.
Great for getting your head into a critical space!
I thoroughly recommend these books to anyone exploring ECE issues. You may not agree with some of the stances taken by the autors but you will certainly be challenged!
Friday, June 18, 2010
Getting busy
I am just launching into work for my thesis so may well be posting even less here. On the other hand I am focusing on socio-cultural approaches to assessment and may well end up posting more! Lets see what happens.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)